Here’s a question from tonight’s US Presidential debate, put to Xbox 360 owners watching it on their system and taking part in the interactive polls.
@carolynmichelle [Twitter]
Now you can get the top stories from Kotaku delivered to your inbox. Enter your email below.
By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Here’s a question from tonight’s US Presidential debate, put to Xbox 360 owners watching it on their system and taking part in the interactive polls.
@carolynmichelle [Twitter]
The Cheapest NBN 1000 Plans
Looking to bump up your internet connection and save a few bucks? Here are the cheapest plans available.
I thought 80% of deaths caused by drones were civilians? So 72% of Xbox users support this to an extent. wow.
Yeah, did they think we wouldn’t pick up on the ‘suspected’ part? Well, 360 users obviously didn’t.
If you take the view than the US is going to kill them (from the skies!) anyway, then a drone strike is preferable.
It’s cheaper, harder to detect, can be effectuated faster and doesn’t risk the life of a pilot.
Can’t say anyone else would* bother watching it or even could watch it. Shouldn’t rush writing these things at work
the real question is whether they can provide demographic information with the responses.
i.e. a band
0-21 – Yes 99% No 0% Undecided 0%
21-35 – Yes 50% No 0% Undecided 50%
etc and the portion of ages that make up the vote. For example it could be that only 55 year olds that respond to these things.
and overlay that with other information like if they play BF3.
and the quantity of people who voted. seriously like 5 people could have voted for that result.
I want a bill passed ensuring drone strikes can only be called in after a soldier gets 5 kills.
Leave a Reply