Feel Like Watching The First 15 Minutes Of Modern Warfare 3?
Comments
78 responses to “Feel Like Watching The First 15 Minutes Of Modern Warfare 3?”
I don’t see the problem? I don’t see what’s sad. The game for me has been fun since CoD 4, i didn’t enjoy Black Ops but infinity ward know what they are doing. If a formula works and is still fun would you really expect them to change things drastically?
-
I’m not even saying change things drastically, just… change anything. There’s nothing about these games that warrants a sequel.
It’s sad because next to no effort is being put into these games, Activision and IW don’t care about them any more. A laughably short campaign and a few new maps for $100? Yeah no thanks. That’s all I’ve gotten from the CoD series for the past five years and there’s no way I’m falling for it again-
‘I’m not even saying change things drastically, just… change anything. There’s nothing about these games that warrants a sequel.’
Umm..finishing the story?
LOL thats all I can argue with. Yeah not much going for it in my eyes.-
Haha, that is true, but I’m guessing that this campaign will be less like CoD4’s campaign and more like MW2’s campaign — short and tacked on. The focus has definitely shifted towards multiplayer since CoD4.
-
-
16 maps are just a few? New guns, equipment, kill streaks, perks, camos, spec ops survival mode, ELITE integration, i dunno seems completely different to me. Label me a CoD fan boy i couldn’t care, i think Infinity Ward and the addition of Sledgehammer are going to put out a well polished game that i’ll play for some time to come. Sucks you don’t feel the same way, your going to be overlooking some multiplayer deliciousness.
-
New guns and equipment? What does that mean? It’s a different model and a different texture in the corner of your screen. They aren’t additions, they’re tweaks. The addition of the survival mode is a legitimate point, though could have easily been achieved through DLC.
I agree, it does suck I don’t feel the same way, CoD2 is the reason I bought a 360 and CoD4 is what got me into PC gaming. I loved the CoD series and I wish it was what it used to be.
-
@Mattroe
What’s the difference between BC2 and BF3?
-
Suppression!
-
Rabble rabble that’s just a visual tweak to indicate when people are putting their bullets near you it doesn’t change anything herp derp.
-
No. Suppression blurs the vision of the enemy player, making it harder for them to see what’s happening. It also prevents health regeneration without a health pack around. Health already regenerates slowly, so suppression is a useful ability that prevents the enemy from advancing and allows your team to move up. I’ve made comebacks using excessive suppression firing.
-
So a new tactic that is the result of some gameplay tweaking anything else aside from the obvious graphical overhaul?
-
I hope you appreciate that my post was sarcastic.
-
It’s not sarcasm when the average player isn’t aware of it.
-
-
-
You are such a hypocrite. First you say “Doesn’t have to be drastic, just change anything”, and then go on to dismiss new maps, weapons as ‘tweaks’.
Hey guess what the definition of that word is? CHANGES.
I can respect a hater for being a hater because at least they know what they are. You sir, a re being a troll and you don’t even know it or don’t want to admit it.
Okay, I’m just going to leave it at this.
If you’re happy to pay $100 every year for the same experience you got last year, whatever. A little sad that people fall for it, but I digress.
Someone asked for the changed between BC2 and BF3. My thinking is, if you can LIST changes between games, there aren’t enough changes. BC2 and BF3 are different games. Health is handled differently, unlocks handle differently, the basic inclusion of prone changes the way the game is played completely, even shooting mechanics are handled differently. It might play similarly in the same way that GTA and Saints Row play similarly, but they’re still entirely different games. Each CoD, however, is the exact same experience. There are “changes”, yes, but you seem to be happy to pay $100 for nothing more than tweaks. And fine, that’s your decision, but CoD will die soon and it didn’t have to die at all.
Put it this way, what are the differences between BF2 and BC2 to BF3? BF3 is more of a collaboration of the two games rather than something innovative in its own. Also, thinking of the campaign of BF3, you can hardly call even MW2’s campaign tacked on. That thing was a mess of quick time events.
I’d love to know what you think can be improved. Oh wow, BF3 included prone, if only MW3 included th- oh wait.
Unlocks are handled differently? Maybe MW3 should do… oh… huh.
Aren’t shooting mechanics still basically aim and shoot while looking down ironsights? Is that so substantially different from BC2 that it’s anything more than a ‘tweak’? As far health, well, I say you don’t fix what ain’t broke. I’d love to know what MW2 did so badly that it needed to be revamped for MW3.
If you want to contrast BC2/MW2 to BF3/MW3 and say that BF3 is a title worth the money when MW3 isn’t, then I will settle this by pointing and laughing. You might like Battlefield more than Call of Duty and that’s your thing, but I can use the same argument to dismiss BF3, and since I didn’t like BC2, why on earth would I buy it?
There it is.
Guess what Mattroe, Battlefield 3 is only a slight improvement on BC2 which was a slight improvement on BC1 which was a huge stepdown from BF2. So grats, you bag a game for minor improvements whilst praising a game that has been dumbing down it’s gameplay all for what? Some shiny graphics and destructive environment?
Sounds like a real winner you picked there.
That’s exactly right… What’s wrong with wanting to hold onto a winning formula? Almost every major games series getting released these days holds onto the same core gameplay elements and introduces a few tweaks or improvements to move the series along…
Think about it: CoD, BF, Assassins Creed, Zelda, Skyrim, Uncharted, Halo, Gears of War, GTA etc. are all incremental improvements on previous entries in their respective series’… And you know what? I’m fine with that… There’s a reason I started enjoying those series in the first place and I don’t want the developers to change things so drastically that it’s unrecognisable when compared to previous entries in the series…
-
yes but his point is Activison are milking the fun out of the game with a new game each year when compared to Skyrim from the last entry was 2007 I think.
but anyway when a series gets pumped out every year it bores the fan and if your willing to play what you played last year for $100 go ahead.-
It annoys me when I see Assassin’s Creed going down this path BF, Halo, CoD and Gears Of War have been going down it for years.
-
I’m looking forward to this getting released, not because I want to buy it, but there will be less kids on BF3!
-
LMAO
I tip my hat to you sir -
Coudln’t have said it better myself!
-
Kids will play whatever’s in front of them. And if they think more people are drifting toward BF3, they’ll move there too. Just as they migrated from Halo to MW, they’re the wave of profanity and immaturity that you have to keep riding and stay in front of.
-
Kids are far easier to deal with than arrogant douchebags. At least the kids have the excuse of not knowing better. What’s your excuse for being a mouth-breather?
-
Bitch.
-
Not you, Steve.
-
-
OH YEAH? I HAVE SOMETHING BETTER!
You don’t fix whats not broken
Back in the day you had about ten games all based on the same engine over a period of about 2 years. Being annoyed about IW/activision basing a few of their games on one of their engines over a couple of years is silly. Im sure they’re working on their next big engine right this second but felt the better option was to use their current engine for the time being and give people more of what they loved the first time around.
-
This is 7 games in 6 years using the same engine in the same series from the same publisher utilising the engine in the same way 🙂
-
Same engine? Might wanna check that…
-
same engine. Quake 3 based engine with graphical tweaks. Every box of COD has an iD liscence on it.
-
Oh I know CoD1 was running idTech 3 albeit heavily modified but it’s not the SAME engine. It may have some tiny parts left over but the rewrites and redesigns mean it’s not the same engine. If you choose to class that as the same engine though then Battlefield from 1942 up to 2142 used the same engine and BC1 to BF3 use the same engine thus rendering the point made about CoD always using the “same engine” moot.
-
Can I hire you to fight all my forum and comment based battles for me?
-
-
-
Tradeded in MW2 and BO and a few other games that I dont play anymore towards this, ended up costing me 7.95, Only getting for the multiplayer, more a time filler between my BF3 adventures and SKYRIM quests
Must one fire one’s weapon in this one?
Needs tanks and dinosaurs
I don’t mean to burst your bubble people, but it’s my understanding IW really only exists in name now. All the senior guys left afer MW2. Sledgehammer was lead studio on single player, Raven Software (They made that wolfenstein game’s multiplayer. Fired on launch day for their terrible netcode) were doing the multiplayer. What’s left of IW afaik were helping with the singleplayer cause sledgehammer were reportedly struggling.
Correct me if i’m wrong.
Short answer; No.
First fifteen minutes? Thats the entire single player campaign!
Now Ill scroll back to see how many others have made the joke before me. . .
go this way shoot this shoot that go down that hallway oh no more bad guys shot this shoot that go that way down this hallway
look a door throw i flash bang coz it’s cool now shoot this shoot that go up that hallway go in this room oh no! shoot this shoot that down the hallway into another room shoot this shoot that you were mortally wounded duck behind cover for a second, now you have some how healed
go down this hallway into this room shoot this shoot that
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU another 15 hours of this shit?!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJE1ZA6LmVM this is the game summarised
lol @ people arguing that cawwadoody isn’t rehashed every year, its a business model. i’ve owned every cod (-mf2) and every battlefield game (yes everyone of them +expansions) so you cant call me a biased fanboy, but call of duty really is just a change of guns and maps, the style is the same, the graphics are the same (although optimisations of newer games allow for more detail) but essentially, they play the same, whereas battlefield 3 is similar to its predecessors in gameplay, but the meta-game changes, mainly because of the date it was set in.
seriously can’t tell the difference between this and Modern Warfare 2.
Meh.
-
didn’t get battlefield 3 either in case any of you were going to make that point.
CoD used to be awesome, its gone down hill after 4. Admit it.
Soap doesn’t die until near the end.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
I mean seriously
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Same shit different smell
Leave a Reply