Death Of A Games Mag (Well, Mags)

Death Of A Games Mag (Well, Mags)
To sign up for our daily newsletter covering the latest news, features and reviews, head HERE. For a running feed of all our stories, follow us on Twitter HERE. Or you can bookmark the Kotaku Australia homepage to visit whenever you need a news fix.

Over at games.net there’s a list of the the “top” ten flops in game mag publishing.

I can’t say I’ve heard of any of the mags they mention (Ziff Davis wanted to charge $US 695 for games industry newsletter? In 2004? I’ll have what its smoking, thanks) but that doesn’t stop it from being an interesting read. Heck, some only lasted a single issue!

Australia’s had its fair share of game mag flops – the Oz version of Edge and Nintendo Gamer, just to name two. It’s crazy to think publishers are still trying to launch magazines when it’s quite obvious the Internet is the future of media.

Good on them for trying though – but I just can’t see how you could make money in such an endeavour.

Feature: Gaming Mag Graveyard! Ten Mags that Died Fast [games.net]

Comments

  • I still read atomic! And retro gamer. I reckon magazines still have their place. The articles can be more in depth.. and they dont need a power supply 😉

  • @Mentoes: Same here. Its kind of due to the fact, in hyper’s case anyway, that because I’ve been reading it for so long now I’m cynical about everyone elses reviews.

    Yeah, sure, theres been some I would say “I’d give that a little lower/higher” but generally they’re spot on with how I feel about a game.

    Atomic I get every time I feel like buying a new pc but I never do. Hah!

Show more comments

Log in to comment on this story!