All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack s dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dult boy. All work and no,play makes Jack a Dull Boy.

All Work and no play makes jack a dull boy. All wori and no play makes Jack a dult boy. All work and no play makes jack a dull boy. all work and n o play makes Jack a dull boy.

All Work And No Play Makes Jack A Dull Boy

All work and no play makes jack adult boy. All workand on play makes jack a dull boy. All w ork and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work qnd no ply makes JAck a du;llboy. All work and no play makes Javk a dull boy. All work and no, play amkes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no pla y makes Jack a dulll boy. All work andno play amkes Jack a dull boy. All work and no plYa , makes Jack a dull.boy,

All work and no play Makes Jack a dull boy.l All work and No play makes Jack a dull.boy. All work and no play makesjack a dull boy. All work and no pl ay makes jack a dull boy. All wori and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

all Work

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play


Comments

    ...Legitimately? That's the article?

    As an opening paragraph, yeah, I could get behind that. But copy+paste for a few paragraphs and hit submit? How the fuck do I apply for a job, because this looks like some easy shit.

      He also could have just posted the video and wrote nothing. Instead we got a shining reference. I didn't mind. Maybe you should take up writing your own articles, getting tired of hearing everyone else say they can do it.

        I'm all for a Shining reference, I really am. In fact, that's the main reason I actually clicked through to the main article. And like I said, as an opening paragraph, it's pretty damm cool, especially considering the video that was being linked.

        But not even a brief speil about it? That just seems lazy to me. Hey, if Gawker are happy to pay this guy to do this stuff, then all the more power to both of them. I just know that if this guy was on my pay roll, I'd rather him put a bit more effort in before I put the money in his wallet.

    Haha, I think someone accidentally posted a test page to the public.

    Seriously, can we get some rules about non-content here? I'm all for "hey, look at this video" but at least explain the video a bit.

    Wow. I'm going to be blunt here. That was by far the most disappointing article I have ever read. The text of the article was lazy but intriguing at first but upon finishing the video, I felt extremely let down. Why are we being informed about an unintuitive maze game? Its really nothing special...

    Slow news day?

    ugh... i can't believe how far i read down before i realised this was supposed to be funny or something...

    It would have been better if he had included some spelling mistakes like what's actually included in the movie. But o well.

      There are spelling mistakes. Not sure why I read that far down though :P

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now