Dust 514 Isn’t Really Free-to-Play

Dust 514, the first-person shooter spinoff from PC MMO EVE Online, was announced as being free-to-play. Turns out that wasn’t strictly true.

It’s been revealed that the PS3 game won’t actually be free to download, as players will have to stump up a “cover charge” of $US10-20 (the final price hasn’t been decided) just to get access to the game, which will then be “refunded” to the player in the form of in-game credits.

Um. If you have to pay money to download a game, it’s not free-to-play. Doesn’t matter how it’s framed. It’s $US10-20 to play. Not really sure why it couldn’t have been advertised as such in the first place!

DUST 514 requires “cover charge” from PS3 players [GI.biz, reg required]

Discuss

(17 Comments)
  • [–]

    Alinos

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 9:39 PM

    Makes sense to me.

    prevents people making accounts for hacking and the like.

    i already know people who have set up hat farms with TF2 free

    • [–]

      Marek

      Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 2:15 AM

      They’ll run into a bit of a problem when they try to trade those items to the main account though: you need to buy something from the store for trading privileges and you can’t add less than $5 to a steam wallet.

  • [–]

    MRS TC

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 9:54 PM

    How is this news? They announced it in early June.

  • [–]

    aliasalpha

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 10:13 PM

    Its free to PLAY, just not free to BUY

    • [–]

      Steve0410

      Monday, July 11, 2011 at 11:35 PM

      This is just splitting hairs and by definition, “Free to play, not free to buy” should include virtually every videogame ever made excluding MMOs.

      There’s a reason the ‘free-to-play’ term exists, and it doesn’t cover cases like this.

    • [–]

      mattroe

      Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 12:06 AM

      By this logic, every game is free to play, which makes your point irrelevant.

      • [–]

        aliasalpha

        Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 10:00 AM

        Well it was actually one of those joke things so it was more facetious than serious

  • [–]

    Thomas Robinson

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 10:16 PM

    Um, didn’t they say this at E3?…

  • [–]

    TimTim

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 10:42 PM

    Australia has regulations from the ACCC governing use of the term “free” – it can only be used when there are literally no conditions or other strings attached.

    But we’re talking a US company here. Not sure if they’re bound by the same rules.

    • [–]

      Christopher

      Monday, July 11, 2011 at 11:27 PM

      Iceland is in the US now? What.

      • [–]

        Braaains

        Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM

        Yeah, I think they got foreclosed on and now the nation has been repossessed. Damn you, GFC! *shakes fist*

  • [–]

    JPhillips

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM

    You all need to take a step back and look at the author…

    • [–]

      thyco

      Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 2:13 AM

      Exactly, Luke has a strong hate for MMOs of any form.

  • [–]

    Kyle_Katarn

    Monday, July 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM

    Since it’s an MMOFPS, then I could still classify it as FTP, even though it sort of goes Guild Wars on us (still not much of a problem to me).

  • [–]

    Jillaye

    Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 12:45 PM

    Another poorly researched article from this author.

    I don’t know how anyone could make this anymore clear, pay for DUST once with no ongoing subscription fee.

  • [–]

    MrBS

    Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 12:52 PM

    I call dibs on the space monacle!

  • [–]

    Allanon10101

    Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 4:17 PM

    If they announced it as “Free-to-play” and have been advertising it as such, and then they are charging people for it, then it’s not free-to-play and it’s false advertising, which is a legal breach

Join The Discussion