PlayStation VR: The Kotaku Review

Let's cut to the chase: PlayStation VR should be better. At its best, Sony's new virtual reality headset manages to conjure the astonishing, immersive wonder of modern virtual reality. Just as often it is frustratingly held back by outdated hardware that can't quite do what's being asked of it. PlayStation VR is Sony's answer to cutting-edge VR headsets like the Facebook-backed Oculus Rift and the Valve-backed HTC Vive. On paper, it offers much the same experience as its competitors at a lower price, powered not by an expensive gaming PC but by a somewhat less expensive PlayStation 4 console.

I've been using the PSVR for the better part of a week and have played a handful of the games that will be available at launch. I've been impressed by some things, turned off by others and made nauseous by a few. Throughout that time I've also been disappointed. Sony's lovely, well designed headset is consistently undermined by inferior motion controllers, an underpowered console and a lacklustre camera.

THE BASICS

PSVR is out next week on October 13. If you buy one, it will run you $549.95 for the headset.

Above: What's in the box, more or less, minus a few cables and plus Move controllers and the camera. The disc contains a handful of free VR demos.

The Move controllers are a known quantity. They came out in 2010 for the PlayStation 3 and work like Wii Remotes. Sony's push for the Move came and went a long time ago, but the controllers still work with the PS4. The camera is familiar, too -- it launched alongside the PS4 and has existed as an odd, underutilised peripheral ever since.

The headset, of course, is new, as is the ambitious attempt to use the PS4 to tie all three pieces of technology together into a coherent VR system. Let's talk about what this thing does well and what it does less well.

It offers a cheaper, still impressive version of modern VR.

We have three major VR headsets at this point, with more on the way. Each one stands on its own as an entertainment device, and each also makes a particular sales pitch for VR as a new way to experience virtual worlds. While each headset puts its unique spin on that pitch, the basic trajectory remains the same.

VR is fundamentally cool. Once you've used one of these headsets, you'll probably want your friends to see it. At times, it makes you feel like you're "there". A giant shark will loom toward you out of dark water, and your adrenaline will spike. You'll peer out over a precipitous drop and your guts will do a backflip. A cute little critter will run up to your feet and you'll instinctively try to pet it. You'll use a motion controller pick up an object off of a nearby table and turn it over in your hand, marvelling at how part of your brain really thinks you're holding it.

PlayStation VR manages all those feats, albeit with more suspension of disbelief required than the competition. It will initially feel familiar to anyone who has tried out an Oculus Rift or an HTC Vive. If you've never tried either of those two headsets, you'll probably be more immediately impressed. You won't notice the funky head tracking. You won't mind that your in-game hands are constantly stuttering. You won't be as put off by the blurry graphics or frame-rate dips.

In fact, there are probably people for whom that will be enough. To its credit, PSVR does convincingly convey the niftiness of modern virtual reality, and it does so powered not by an expensive gaming PC, but by a game console that millions of people already own.

Let's not kid ourselves. It's still very expensive.

Most people will have to pay over $549.95 for PSVR, factoring in the price of the Move controllers ($119.95) and camera ($89.95). That comes up to $780. And while you'll get a disc containing demos of several VR games, there are no full games. You'll have to buy those separately.

At $780, PSVR is indeed a more affordable option than the competition. The Oculus Rift costs $US649 ($851) and will cost even more once its Touch controllers launch later this year. The HTC Vive, which comes with its own handheld controllers, costs $US899 ($1179) - excluding shipping. Moreover, the Rift and Vive both require powerful gaming PCs that can cost two or three times as much as a PS4, if not more.


PSVR may be the cheapest of the big three VR headsets, but that only means it’s the cheapest of three very expensive things.


But let's not kid ourselves: A relatively cheap VR headset is still awfully expensive. You could buy a new gaming console for $780 and still have enough cash left over for a few games. You could buy a cutting-edge smartphone and have enough left over for a year of online storage and streaming music. You could buy a secondhand ticket to Hamilton.

One of the best launch games, Super Hypercube, will cost $US30 ($39, Australian pricing not yet confirmed), and most of the other games are in the $US20-40 ($26-52) range. The multiplayer tank-wars game Battlezone costs a whopping $84.95, which certainly seems high for what I've played of it.

So, some perspective. PSVR may be the cheapest of the big three VR headsets, but that only means it's the cheapest of three very expensive things.

It's pretty easy to set up, but requires some adjusting.

The PSVR isn't all that difficult to set up. You run a passthrough HDMI cable from the small new PSVR receiver box to your TV, and another HDMI cable to your PS4. You plug a USB cable from the box into your PS4. You plug the headset into the box. You sync the two Move controllers and plug in the camera. You put the camera on top of your TV. You run a quick calibration, and that's pretty much it.

However, I've found that the PS4 can require an annoying amount of adjusting in between games. I've yet to find a sweet spot where I can play any game standing up, sitting down or anything in between. A few times, if I've wanted to sit for one game and stand for another, I've had to adjust my camera so that my head stays set within a small box. Other games have told me I'm leaned too far back, out of the play area.

You can reset the orientation by holding down the Options button mid-game, which resets the horizontal and vertical orientation of the game. Weirdly, I've found that some games begin to rotate ever so slightly to the left or right as I play, an annoyance that the Options button appears powerless to fix. At one point my Battlezone cockpit rotated until I was sitting at an angle on my couch, seemingly unable to make the game point me back forward. It wasn't until I started a new game that it went back to normal.

When you turn the headset on, your PS4 dashboard immediately pops up in the headset and you're off to the races. The ease with which I can go from "not playing VR" to "playing VR" is admirable, and makes it much easier to decide on a whim to put on the headset and play some games, or show it to friends I've invited over. Whatever annoying calibration steps are required, PSVR does remove a lot of barriers between you and playing a game.

The headset is great.

The headset is a nice piece of electronics, smartly designed and comfortable for extended periods of time. It also plays well with glasses -- even my big chunkers -- though if given the option I'd still prefer to wear contacts.

Rather than strapping to the front of your face, the PSVR eyepiece hangs down from a plastic halo-hat that goes around the crown of your head. You can easily open the halo by pressing a release button on the back. Once you've got it on, you can fine-tune the fit by turning a knob next to the button. You can also press a second button to independently slide the face-mask forward and backward, which makes it a cinch to fit over your glasses without smushing them into your face.

The optics themselves fit comfortably and are framed by soft rubber blinders that gently block out most outside light from around your eyes and nose. It breathes well, and my face rarely feels crowded by the PSVR in the way it often does by other VR headsets. As a bonus, it's easy to scratch your eye or nose while playing. (Seemingly a small thing, but actually very nice!) I do find that my hair frequently falls down into my eyes and obscures my vision, but I guess I need a haircut anyway.

I can't tell you exact numbers, but the headset's field of vision feels open. In a given VR game I rarely noticed the black binocular effect happening outside of the visible area. In-headset visuals are clear, and the blurriness and frame-rate issues some games have are likely more due to underpowered graphics processing hardware than any deficiency in the headset.

The PSVR headset is almost entirely made of plastic. It's fairly light and manages screen-heat effectively, which keeps it from feeling heavy or hot over longer play sessions. (That being said, for me a "longer" session has only been an hour or so, as most of the PSVR games I've got to play are insubstantial.)

The headset does contain a lot of interlocking, breakable plastic parts, and the fitting mechanism in particular seems like it will degrade over time. But overall: Good headset.

The other hardware is much less great.

Unfortunately, the headset is only part of the equation. The bulk of my issues with PlayStation VR are related to all the other stuff. From what I've played over the last week, the PlayStation Move controllers, camera and even the PS4 itself do not appear to be up to the task of smoothly running modern VR games.

The camera does a middling job of tracking your head's movement, and sometimes when I'd move more than 30 to 60cm in any direction, I would find that the whole screen would freeze and shake.

There's also the issue of what I think of as "persistent controller shudder". In most PSVR games, you can look down and see either your DualShock controller or, if you're playing a Move game, some sort of in-game representation of the Move controllers. In every game I've played, my in-game controllers are constantly moving even if I'm holding them perfectly still. It's as though my character has the shakes.

Above: I'm holding the controller perfectly still.

For example, one sequence in Arkham VR has the player reading clipboards in a morgue, and the shaking was so pronounced that I had a hard time reading the giant text on the paper. The gif above does an OK job recreating the effect, but it's much more noticeable and off-putting when you're wearing the headset.

This pervasive, low-level controller shudder exists in every PSVR game I've played. I've tested the layout of my living room, checked the lighting and made sure everything is clear, all to no avail. A few other people I've spoken with who have used a PSVR, including my colleague Stephen Totilo, have described a similar experience. It's possible we have all failed to properly optimise some setting or other, but unlikely.

It's easier to ignore controller shudder if you're moving around and playing a game, but any time I'd pause to pick something up and examine it, I'd find it moving forward and backward by several centimetres. It made me feel like I was having a seizure, which, given the tendency for VR games to induce nausea, is not a good starting point. (Speaking of nausea, I did have to stop a weekend session of Battlezone due to VR sickness, but I hesitate to draw too many conclusions from that. Stephen played more than I did and has had no issues.)

In addition to the controller shake, my camera has had a hard time tracking my full range of motion. In Job Simulator and Arkham VR, I frequently found that my hands would simply vanish into thin air as they moved outside the view of the camera. This greatly limits the physical possibility space of a given game.

For example: One of the pleasures of playing Job Simulator on the HTC Vive is the fact that you can really occupy the 3D space. In the Vive version of the game, you can crawl under your desk and peer into the trash can. Here's a clip of me playing the Vive version back in April:

Above: Job Simulator on HTC Vive.

On PSVR, I couldn't do even crouch without losing control of my hands entirely:

Above: Job Simulator on PSVR. I hadn't even knelt down and the camera lost sight and my hands floated away from me.

If you drop a key in Batman: Arkham VR and try to pick it up, your hand will simply disappear as you reach out of the frame and the key will reappear on the piano in front of you:

The PlayStation camera can only see you from the front, which causes some other problems, too. In games where I was using the Move controllers, I moved around naturally but frequently found myself blocking the camera's view of the controllers with my body. I'd turn around and try to pick something up, only to watch my hand fade and glitch out as the camera lost tracking.

The PS Move came out for the PS3 in 2010. It's now six years old. The PlayStation camera came out in 2013. I understand why Sony would use existing controllers and cameras rather than developing and releasing much more expensive new ones, but the compromise they have made is evident in almost every moment of every game. It's difficult to shake the feeling that this older hardware has been conscripted into the service of a pursuit that is beyond its capacity.

Some of the games are neat, but so far most aren't that exciting.

Even the most amazing gaming hardware will fail if it doesn't have any good games. The inverse of that is also true. Lacklustre hardware can be saved if the games are good enough. From what I've played, the PSVR's game library fails to make up for the hardware's shortcomings. That could change as Sony sends along more launch games, however.

Super Hypercube is the most consistently enjoyable of the games I've played. It's a simple, ingenious Tetris-inspired affair that conceptually places you above an ever-growing 3D tetromino and has you rotating it to make it fit through a hole in the floor before it collides. The effect of playing the game, however, is that of slamming forward through a series of tiny keyholes in a neon starscape.

It's a lot of fun, stylishly made with a fantastic feel and punchy, poppy rhythm. It's also a very simple use of VR. There's no walking around or exploration, you just have to peer around your shape and quickly work out how to make this three dimensional object fit through a two-dimensional hole. (No surprise that a game that so creatively reconciles 3D and 2D would come from Polytron, makers ofFez.)

Other games are less exciting. Arkham VR is a brief return to Rocksteady's gritty take on Gotham City, and mostly feels like a series of somewhat interactive cutscenes. Most of the scenes have you standing still and looking around. Amusingly, action will often take place against a black loading screen, with combat sound effects playing in your ears like an old Batman radio play.

The most interesting sequence has you working through one of the Arkham games' holographic crime scenes, rewinding and pausing playback of the action to attempt to figure out what happened. It's the sort of thing that could make for a fascinating crime scene investigation game, were that the sole focus. Unfortunately, it's just a small part of the game.

Battlezone places you in the cockpit of a tank that feels straight out of Tron and lets you play alongside up to three friends as you take on fleets of enemy vehicles. I played this one online with a few people and it never quite gelled for me. Even on easy, we were constantly getting killed, and after about an hour I felt like I'd seen all there was to see. My tank would also frequently clip and lock into my teammates' tanks, triggering a sort of mecha-body horror that's difficult to put into words.

A demo of Rez Infinite was nifty but often visually overwhelming and suffered from perplexing frame-rate issues that will hopefully be absent from the full game. PlayStation VR Worlds is a familiar collection of "wow look at the cool VR!" demos and mini-games, including a somewhat nauseating street luge ride and a scripted encounter with a terrifying fucker of a giant shark. Job Simulator is silly fun but as I've mentioned is inferior to its other versions.

We still have a lot of PSVR launch games to try, so we'll be playing and talking about more of them in the weeks and months to come. Some interesting-sounding games are inbound later in the spring, including the multiplayer Star Trek: Bridge Crew. Speaking of the weeks and months to come…

It's hard to be optimistic about the future.

All last week, I kept coming back to the fact that the PSVR peripherals I've been using are mostly failed Sony hardware products. The Move motion controller came out six years ago and failed to catch on as an alternative to the Nintendo Wii. The PlayStation camera launched in 2013 alongside the PS4 and failed to become even as useful as the not-that-useful Xbox Kinect.

The PSVR, then, starts to feel like Sony's Island of Misfit Toys. It's a magnet for gadgets that didn't succeed on their own merits, and it's hard to believe that, together, they might finally break through. Back in 2014, Sony's Richard Marks explained to us that, in a way, the Move didn't meet its potential because it was designed to work within a 3D space, rather than the 2D screen to which it was initially constrained. But the fact remains that Sony is not using the concept of the Move for their new VR controller. They're using actual six-year-old Move controllers. It's admirable that they have gotten the results they have, but hard to overlook how far behind the old tech is lagging.


The PSVR starts to feel like Sony’s Island of Misfit Toys.


The upcoming PS4 Pro will offer significantly more processing power than the current PS4, which Sony says will allow VR games to potentially run at higher, more consistent frame-rates. We'll certainly report back on how the PS4 Pro does with the current slate of PSVR games, but all the GPU horsepower in the world can't make the Move and the PlayStation camera any less outdated. Furthermore, if the PS4 Pro does wind up being the preferred way to play PSVR games, the extra cost of the new console puts a significant dent in the PSVR's appeal as a lower-priced VR alternative.

If you buy a PSVR, you're locking yourself in with Sony and hoping that they continue to support the headset. Ironically, both the Move in your hand and the camera on your TV are reminders that Sony frequently does not support their hardware, and for all of Sony's assurances about their commitment to VR, I'm sceptical that the PSVR will be any different. Unlike competing PC headsets, it will be much harder for the PSVR to find an extended life though hacks and independently created software. If Sony decides to stop supporting it, it will fast become one more hunk of plastic sitting in the closet.

IN CONCLUSION

The PlayStation VR narrative goes like this: While HTC and Oculus have been off making expensive, cutting-edge headsets for high-end PC gamers, Sony is swooping in with a more approachable, affordable alternative for everyday people.

I have my doubts about that narrative. My sense is that VR as a whole is just not there yet, and that Sony is valiantly attempting to make the first mainstream version of a technology that is not yet mature enough to go mainstream.

It's certainly possible that I'm wrong. The PSVR could wind up being good enough, a curious designation that is difficult to predict or assign. The Nintendo Wii had lousy graphics that couldn't compete with the Xbox 360 and the PS3, but its motion controls were good enough that it became a global phenomenon. The original N64 Goldeneye was in many ways inferior to the first-person PC games of the era, but it was good enough to get people excited about a console FPS years before Halo.

PlayStation VR is inferior to the competition in several significant ways. It's also less expensive and easier to use, and for all its flaws it still manages to communicate the goofy, surreal joy of modern virtual reality. Time will tell if that makes it good enough. Best to wait and see.


Comments

    Got my eye on that Hatsune Miku VR Concert thing. Mmmm hmmmm.

    Interesting review, and worthy of a read. I'm still getting it based on the opposite of what your review said - specifically that people found the tracking to be quite good, obviously not as good as vive or oculus, but good for old technology and the camera.

    In saying that, I saw Tested's review and they mentioned the same as you - I did notice in all their footage though that it was a very bright room, and in one shot I saw what looked to be a blue LED cat lamp on a book shelf in the background. I wonder if this kind of environment causes an issue?

    From the reviews where people have said the tracking has been impressive, it seems to be on Sony's dark banner backdrop at their demo stations

    While PSVR may be good enough, it has one advantage that Vive and Occulus dont have... a hardware giant with manufacturing, marketing and distribution. with enough clout to make AAA developers think there may be a big enough market to really invest in VR games.

    Valve doesnt advertise and Occulus spends most of its money on Trump memes than game development, after disasterous distribution and manufacturing problems you would think they would be pushing the marketing not sitting quietly while PSVR surfaces to steal their momentum.

      And let's not forget a target audience that's perfectly fine with "good enough" - this thing will sell like hot cakes. A pity it needs one of the console's two USB ports... tho maybe I won't need one for my wireless headphones with this thing, provided the VR's headphone jack is stereo+mic.

      Agree Os42... And another factor in the good enough VR will be the first type of VR most consumers will get to truely expwience at there nearest shopping centre ebgames target or big W.

      Its easy to compare it to Occulus and Vive and say its goid enough... but I have never seen either of them in an Australian. (Well once at an expo that had a line so long I thought someone clogged the exhibition centre tiolet again)

      on the flip side though the PSVR is on a closed platform and won't have the support of the adult film industry which has had a lot of weight in deciding which platforms succeed and which fail in the past lol

      Hyperbole harder. An Oculus employee spending $10k of their personal cash is both irrelevant and a drop in the ocean compared to the millions the company has been investing into development.

        Yes... but the catch there is this. The Only VR news in months out of vive or Occulus was that.

        The last major gane conference was all tge PSVR titles... occulus and vive investment is not paying off in the market media and engagement stacks. It still feels like a limited enthusiats machine even after going full production.

          Wow, a platform that is on the verge of release where a whole pile of titles on top of each other is big news compared to the established platforms that have constantly releasing content for months now. Who would have thought.

          The real interesting thing will be to see how it all plays out over the Christmas period.

            Ha your calling Vive and Occulus established... im saying it isnt. They had a realease and it dropped like a broken brick on the pavement. It was hyped, did the media circus and then nothing... no momentum or forward thinking. Leaving the innovation mostly in the hands of indie developers isnt doing them great... when Sony has AAAs offering timed exclusives

      You clearly underestimate how good Sony is at self sabotage...

        No better or worse than Microsoft or Nintendo... while Valve and Occulus are struggling to sell their hardware into the mainstream.

    I find VR incredibly creepy and won't be getting it ever, good or bad functionality be damned *shakes fist at cloud*

      Creepy how?

        I get the willies looking at someone wearing a VR headset. It's creepy and makes me uncomfortable.

          Man you must really hate motorcyclists :p

            I ride one, you have a visor that look out at the real world and can hear things! I don't know it just freaks me out for some lizard brain reason.

    The PSVR needs to be reviewed with the PS4 Pro. It kinda the whole point of the PS4 pro.
    Once we get closer to Xmas I suspect it would be smart to do a bundle together offer with some decent games? That's when we'll know for sure...

    Last edited 06/10/16 11:02 am

    I wonder what the rationale behind reusing the Move controllers was? No one* owns these so everyone* will have to buy them when they buy PSVR. So why didn't they create updated, dedicated VR controllers and bundle them? They seem to be the weak link and considering that it's presumably a minor effort to update (relative to the complexity of the VR unit) it would be a no-brainer.

      Design wise, you probably could update them easily. Manufacturing wise? Might be trickier. If you already have the suppliers, the tooling, etc, and you think they're "good enough," I can see why you'd just reuse them.

      I also wouldn't be surprised if they release a move/camera "pro" in the next 12 months.

      It's weird, but I've owned Move controllers since the PS3 era, and I've never experienced shuddering while using them, except when I hide them from the camera and then show them. That's with the PS3 camera too! The games I've used it with have shown solid control, albeit with a minor lag to the response. I'd say around 40-50ms.

      With the higher frame rate of the PS4 camera, I'd expect that lag to all but disappear in a puff of imperceptibility. But I haven't tried it with the PS4 camera, so can't speak from experience.

      Still, something is going on, when you have consistent reviews from well established and experienced reviewers speaking the same criticism. It's got me confused, as it contradicts my experience with the controllers. My initial thought on hearing that the PSVR uses the Move controllers was that it was a perfect match.

      Anyway, guess I'll be finding out in a week's time. Still struggling to believe a good number of reviewers are having issues with the Move. I can't believe it's the controller hardware itself. Perhaps the PS4 is working too hard and is missing time-critical controller data? It'll be very interesting to compare the experience with the PS4 Pro.

    Considering preorders for this are sold out everywhere I don't think you can really compare it to the Move launch which I don't remember even raising an eyebrow.

    I'm getting one because it's a low cost entry point to VR (For me at least, considering I bought the camera at launch, and I bought Move Controllers back when they originally came out - so no extra hardware needed, just the headset).

    I'm really keen on Driveclub VR and I have a wheel setup so it should be amazing based on the videos I've seen of people playing it.

    Waiting until some clever cookie mods the headset so I can use it with my PC.

      If that happens the positive is - it will be cheaper! The downside is that from what I remember reading, it has a lower res and was talk of locked 60fps (but that could be software locked).

        Pretty sure it can do 60fps "upscaled" with frame interpolation to 120fps, as well as native 90 and 120 if the games are made to drive those kinds of rates.

          Yep, PSVR scales up 60fps to 120fps. It uses "reprojection" though, not "frame interpolation". The two techniques are pretty different.

            ...I know this, but have no idea why I said what I did instead.

        The lower resolution is apparently offset by the OLED display and the subpixel arrangement. The one thing that's still a little off putting with the Rift and Vive is still the screen door effect. It's barely noticeable, but it is noticeable. The screen on the PSVR has less screen door effect due to the type of display used.

    Anyone else feel like these impressions are a little....I don't know, polite?

    It's Sony, I get it, so it's going to be tough medicine to swallow for some people that this isn't the assured, confident, world-conquering device we're used to seeing.

    I'm so-so on VR, and nothing I've seen from the evangelical reporting in the video-games space of its _potential_ is actually being conveyed in reports covering the real deal.

    It's compounded when we see mealy-mouthed stuff like this. Maybe in future we could see two different takes - one that highlights the great things about the positives; while another absolutely without fear tears it down showing all the negatives.

    Done right, it'd actually encourage people to think critically and arrive at their own conclusion, somewhere in the middle of those two extremes.

    It's the PS4 launch all over again - 'hey, the launch games are all pretty crappy, but you suckers better buy some of these because we need to be able to write about this stuff'.

    Ironically, both the Move in your hand and the camera on your TV are reminders that Sony frequently does not support their hardware

    Yet, also ironically, here we are years later and Sony have a VR headset and a bunch of games for it that DO support this hardware. How many Kinect / Wii games are coming out in the next 6-12 months?

      Put it in prospective since your doing a orange to apples comparison. The move controllers have a few games coming now thanks to PSVR but have had nothing for what, over 4 years?

      The Wii may not have any new games, but the Motion Controller has been used and supported throughout the Wii and Wii Us lifetime in multiple new games and also backwards compatability. So a little over 8 years?

      Factor in - the NX may also have wii motion support, meaning there may be further support we dont know about yet and more games yet to come!

      So its not really ironic at all in any form. Sony gave up support and stopped using it years ago and has just repurposed them - Nintendo still has major support and MAY still support them.

      Kinect - yeah well.. /no comment.

        Move has been supported for years with certain titles like MLB the show and tiger woods pga etc
        I even played through killzone 3 with the move controllers and a gun attachment a few years back
        It didnt kick off like they wanted it to but its still been used over the years
        I have a wheel setup and personally am looking forwars to dirt rally and project cars seeing as they support vr an pc i figure ita only a matter of time and that's where this kind of peripheral will be king! Vr racing will be the only way for people with a wheel!

        Move was much better than Kinect or anything else out there on the market at the time. Includes the Hydra. It was way ahead of it's time. If there is one thing Sony understands, it's the need for physical buttons and tangible controllers.

    Really wanted to pick this up when it launched but im going to force myself to wait

    All this VR is great Tech but I keep getting the feeling it will go the way of the cameras and the move controllers. Solutions looking for problems....

    Until the games get good, just use it to watch netflix on a virtual cinema screen.

    There you go, killer app right there.

Join the discussion!

Trending Stories Right Now